URSICH v. da ROSA

No. 18409.

328 F.2d 794 (1964)

Frank URSICH, Appellant, v. Manuel D. da ROSA et al., Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied April 7, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Margolis & McTernan, and Ben Margolis, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Lillick, Geary, McHose, Roethke & Myers, Gordon K. Wright, and David L. Hayutin, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before HAMLIN, BROWNING and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.


DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:

Appellant was a fisherman employed aboard the appellees' vessel and was injured while so employed. He brought this action under the Jones Act (46 U.S.C. § 688) charging negligence. In a separate count he sought maintenance and cure. The Jones Act count was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict for appellees.

The evidence shows that the appellees' boat, which had returned from a fishing trip, was tied up alongside a dock in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases