BAILEY v. ARMOUR SERVICE OF OKLAHOMA, INC.

Civ. No. 64-10.

228 F.Supp. 879 (1964)

Bennie Joe BAILEY, Plaintiff, v. ARMOUR SERVICE OF OKLAHOMA, INC., Armour Management Corporation, Armour Oil Company, and Earl White, an individual, Defendants.

United States District Court W. D. Oklahoma.

March 16, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Lacy and Don Manners, Oklahoma City, for plaintiff.

James W. Shepherd, c/o Foliart, Shepherd & McPherren, Oklahoma City, for defendants.


DAUGHERTY, District Judge.

Upon consideration of the Motion to Dismiss of the defendants and the response of plaintiff thereto and the briefs filed in support of and in opposition to said motion, the Court finds that said Motion to Dismiss should be sustained and this action should be dismissed due to a lack of jurisdiction in this court, inasmuch as there does not exist the required diversity of citizenship between the parties plaintiff and defendant.

The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases