After hearing the testimony herein, I find that the claimant was actually in contact with his car when the hit and run vehicle smashed into the claimant's vehicle, knocked him down and injured him. Thus, he may not have been "in" the vehicle at the time of impact, but he was "upon" it. Be that as it may, it does not seem within the declaration of purpose of the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation Law to exclude him, under...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
