WHITMAN v. WHITMAN

No. 41237.

397 P.2d 664 (1964)

Helen Loretta WHITMAN, Executrix of the Estate of Paul S. Whitman, Deceased, Plaintiff in Error, v. Florence M. WHITMAN, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

December 15, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kay Wilson, Jr., Muskogee, for plaintiff in error.

Andrew Wilcoxen, Muskogee, for defendant in error.


IRWIN, Justice.

Subsequent to the entry of a divorce decree and death of her former husband, the divorced wife instituted the instant proceeding to revive the divorce action against the executrix of the deceased husband's estate. The manifest object of this proceeding was to maintain the order for child support in continuing force and vitality. The trial court revived the action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases