1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 161 So.2d
  5. 161 So.2d 896 (1964)
 

MIRSKY v. BURGER

No. 63-503.

161 So.2d 896 (1964)

William MIRSKY and Mary Mirsky, d/b/a Marlyn's Beauty Salon, Appellants, v. Belle BURGER, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

March 24, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W.F. Parker, Miami, for appellants.

Frates, Fay & Floyd and Kermit G. Kindred, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C.J., and HORTON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The only question preserved for review on this appeal is whether or not the trial judge erred in denying the motion for new trial, which motion was grounded principally upon the insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict.

The trial judge's orders are met in this court with a presumption of correctness. See: Southern Pine Extracts Company v. Bailey, Fla. 1954, 75 So.2d 774

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases