HANSKA v. HANSKA

No. 40602.

395 P.2d 648 (1964)

Richard L. HANSKA, Plaintiff in Error, v. Angela E. HANSKA, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

September 29, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sizemore & Sanford, by Lawrence E. Sizemore, Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.

E. William Brown, Hal S. Whitten, Jr., Oklahoma City, for defendant in error.


PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal on the original record by Richard L. Hanska (plaintiff below) from an order made in a divorce case directing him to pay an attorney fee.

The circumstances are that the defendant in the divorce action, Angela E. Hanska, was represented by E. William Brown and that in the divorce decree Hanska was ordered to pay an attorney fee of $100 for the benefit of Brown, payable into the court clerk...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases