FISHER v. SINROD

No. 3361.

197 A.2d 846 (1964)

Jess FISHER, Appellant, v. Nathan SINROD and Hymen H. Tash trading as Sinrod & Tash, Appellees.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided February 28, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark P. Friedlander, Washington, D. C., with whom Mark P. Friedlander, Jr., Blaine P. Friedlander, Washington, D. C., and Harry P. Friedlander, Arlington, Va., were on the brief, for appellant.

Raymond Gittelman, Washington, D. C., for appellees.

Before HOOD, Chief Judge, and QUINN and MYERS, Associate Judges.


MYERS, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment for appellees upon a complaint by appellant seeking to recover part of his loss in an investment venture based upon an alleged written agreement by appellees to reimburse him, which they subsequently disclaimed. Appellees plead lack of consideration, estoppel to assert any alleged misrepresentation, and the bar of the statute of limitations.

The trial court found there was no substantial evidence to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases