HOPPER v. HOPPER

No. 4717

392 P.2d 629 (1964)

Christine T. HOPPER, Appellant, v. Stuart P. HOPPER, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Nevada

June 3, 1964


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Babcock & Sutton, of Las Vegas, for appellant.

Singleton & DeLanoy and Rex A. Jemison, of Las Vegas, for Respondent.


By the Court, THOMPSON, J.:

In this case the husband's separate property, a home, was improved by the construction of a swimming pool paid for by the separate funds of the wife. In a divorce action the trial court, in dividing property, failed to reimburse the wife for the cost of the swimming pool (about $3,000). That court reasoned that the law presumed a gift from the wife to the husband of the swimming pool cost, which presumption was not rebutted. The wife appeals...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases