1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 337 F.2d
  5. 337 F.2d 664 (1964)
 

APPLICATION OF CONTI

Patent Appeal No. 7222.

337 F.2d 664 (1964)

Application of Alfred R. CONTI and Daniel J. Menter.

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

November 5, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Franklin E. Quale, Detroit, Mich., (Whittemore, Hulbert & Belknap, Detroit, Mich., George A. Degnan, Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.

Clarence W. Moore, Washington, D. C., (Jere W. Sears, Washington, D. C., of counsel), for the Commissioner of Patents.

Before RICH, Acting Chief Judge, and MARTIN, SMITH, and ALMOND, Judges, and Judge WILLIAM H. KIRKPATRICK.

ALMOND, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the examiner's rejection of appellants' claims 35 and 36 as unpatentable over prior art. No other claims remain in appellants' application1 entitled "Cutting Tool."

Appellants state in their brief that claim 35 is the only claim to be dealt with inasmuch as "Claim 36 depends therefrom, and simply defines certain cam and clamp structure more specifically...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases