UNITED STATES v. HUCK MANUFACTURING COMPANY

Crim. No. 39017.

214 F.Supp. 776 (1963)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. HUCK MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Townsend Company, A. Watson Armour, III, Fred R. Dickinson, Defendants.

United States District Court E. D. Michigan, S. D.

March 13, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles R. Esherick, Jack Lipson, Antitrust Division Dept. of Justice Washington, D. C., Lawrence Gubow, U. S. Atty., Detroit, Mich., for plaintiff.

James E. Haggerty, Vandeveer, Haggerty, Doelle, Garzia, Tonkin & Kerr, Arthur W. Dickey, Harness, Dickey & Pierce, Detroit, Mich., for Huck Mfg. Co. and A. Watson Armour, III, defendants.

Daniel J. Tindall, Jr., Dickinson, Wright, McKean & Cudlip, Detroit, Mich., T. W. Pomeroy, Jr., Kirkpatrick, Pomeroy, Lockhart & Johnson, Pittsburgh, Pa., for Townsend Co. and Fred R. Dickinson, defendants.


KAESS, District Judge.

This is a proceeding to determine criminal liability under the Sherman Act. The defendants are charged with conspiracy in restraint of trade and conspiracy to monopolize through entry into a restrictive patent arrangement. The defendants have moved the court for judgments of acquittal at the close of the Government's case.

Simplifying, or perhaps over-simplifying, the Government has established the following, at least prima facie: Huck...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases