NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. SOUTHWIRE COMPANY

No. 20008.

313 F.2d 638 (1963)

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. SOUTHWIRE COMPANY, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

March 6, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Alfred Brummel, Atty., Washington, D. C., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Atty., National Labor Relations Bd., for petitioner.

Frank M. Swift, Atlanta, Ga., Smith, Swift, Currie, McGhee & Hancock, Atlanta, Ga., Holderness & Word, Carrollton, Ga., for respondent.

Before JONES and BELL, Circuit Judges, and GROOMS, District Judge.


PER CURIAM.

In this proceeding for the enforcement against the respondent of an order of the petitioner, National Labor Relations Board, the only question before us is whether there is substantial evidence on the record as a whole to sustain the Board's findings. No purpose would be served by a recital of the evidence or of the fact issues which were resolved by the Board. There is substantial evidence to support the findings. The Board's order will be

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases