BOGERT v. HERRICK


37 Misc.2d 907 (1963)

H. Earl Bogert, Appellant, v. Philip R. Herrick et. al., Respondents

City Court of Binghamton.

January 17, 1963


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bellew & Conte (Kenneth P. Helisek of counsel), for appellant. Cohn & Daniels (Thomas Muscatello of counsel), for respondents.


LOUIS M. GREENBLOTT, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from an order dated January 2, 1963 by the City Judge of the City Court of Binghamton directing an examination before trial of the plaintiff.

Appellant contends that section 288 of the Civil Practice Act does not apply to the Binghamton City Court Act and that the court had no jurisdiction to grant such an order. Section 288 provides, in part...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases