MONROE AUTO EQUIP. CO. v. HECKETHORN MFG. & SUPPLY CO.

Civ. No. 3791.

214 F.Supp. 704 (1963)

MONROE AUTO EQUIPMENT COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. HECKETHORN MANUFACTURING AND SUPPLY COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court W. D. Tennessee, W. D.

February 11, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Don K. Harness, Detroit, Mich., Walter Armstrong, Jr., Memphis, Tenn., for plaintiff.

Robert F. Conrad, Washington, D. C., M. Watkins Ewell, Sr., Dyersburg, Tenn., for defendant.


BOYD, Chief Judge.

After trial to this court without the intervention of a jury, plaintiff's demand for a jury having been stricken on motion of the defendant, the court found that the plaintiff could not prevail in its action for infringement of claims under two patents dealing with shock absorbers, nor could it prevail in its claim of unfair competition. The court's disposition of this case is reported in 204 F.Supp. at page 249.

This court found that the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases