PER CURIAM.
The appellant endorsed a demand promissory note subsequent to execution and delivery at a time when the corporate maker [of which the appellant was the president] was behind in payments, and when certain of the collateral securities securing the obligation had decreased materially in value. Under the terms of the note, the payee bank had a right to demand "* * * additional securities to the satisfaction of the Payee * * *". This right was exercised, and...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
