1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 320 F.2d
  5. 320 F.2d 580 (1963)
 

SEAWIND COMPANIA, S. A. v. CRESCENT LINE, INC.

No. 352, Docket 27593.

320 F.2d 580 (1963)

SEAWIND COMPANIA, S. A., Libelant-Appellant, v. CRESCENT LINE, INC., now known as Falcon Shipping Corp., Respondent-Appellee, Kulukundis Lines Inc., Kulukundis Lines, Ltd., and Michael Kulukundis, etc., Respondents.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Decided July 9, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Foley & Grainger, New York City (Robert P. Whelan, of counsel), for libelant-appellant.

Werner, French & Molloy, New York City (Henry P. Molloy, Jr., New York City, of counsel), for respondent-appellee.

Before WATERMAN, FRIENDLY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

WATERMAN, Circuit Judge.

Seawind Compania, S. A., appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Bonsal, J., sitting in the admiralty, by which the attachment of credits and effects of respondent-appellee, Crescent Lines, Inc., now known as Falcon Shipping Corp., was vacated. The attachment had been made pursuant to Rule 2 of the Rules of Practice in Admiralty and Maritime Cases promulgated by the United States Supreme...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases