1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 211 Cal.App.2d
  5. 211 Cal.App.2d 649 (1963)
 

S & Q CONSTRUCTION CO. v. HAYNIE

Docket No. 10618.

211 Cal.App.2d 649 (1963)

27 Cal. Rptr. 589

S & Q CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. M.D. HAYNIE, Defendant and Respondent. M.D. HAYNIE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. S & Q CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al., Defendants and Appelants. (Consolidated Cases.)

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

January 9, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip Steiner, Steiner, O'Dea & Luckham and Honey, Mayall, Hurley & Knutsen for Appellants.

Jones, Lane & Weaver and Roy Weaver for Respondent.

SCHOTTKY, J.

This is an application by S & Q Construction Company and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company for a writ of prohibition or supersedeas to prevent enforcement of a money judgment in favor of M.D. Haynie.

S & Q was the contractor on a public construction project for the City of Stockton. Hartford was its surety on a bond furnished in accordance with the provisions of section 4200 et seq. of the Government Code. Haynie was a subcontractor...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases