URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY OF CITY RENO. v. IACOMETTI

No. 4555.

379 P.2d 466 (1963)

79 Nev. 113

URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY OF the CITY OF RENO, Nevada, a public corporation, the City of Reno, a municipal corporation, et al., Appellants, v. John IACOMETTI and Maria Angelina Iacometti, his wife, et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

March 11, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cooke & Roberts, of Reno; Roy Lee Torvinen, City Attorney, City of Reno, and Richard Breitwieser, Assistant City Attorney, for Appellants.

Streeter, Sala & Richards; Lohse & Fry; John S. Halley; Guild, Busey & Guild and Howard Cunningham; Emile J. Gezelin; Sidney W. Robinson; all of Reno, for Respondents.


THOMPSON, Justice.

This case involves the Urban Renewal Law, NRS 279.010-279.380. It is here upon appeal from a judgment of the district court which dismissed, after trial, multiple condemnation actions instituted by the Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Reno.

In broad outline the Urban Renewal Law concerns "slum" and "blighted" areas which were found to be a menace to public health, safety, morals and welfare, contribute to the spread of disease and crime...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases