1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 214 Cal.App.2d
  5. 214 Cal.App.2d 626 (1963)
 

PRIP v. CITY OF SANTA BARBARA

Docket No. 26876.

214 Cal.App.2d 626 (1963)

29 Cal. Rptr. 558

CHRISTIAN PRIP, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF SANTA BARBARA, Defendant and Respondent; DONALD G. CARTER et al., Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

March 29, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ardy V. Barton for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Stanley T. Tomlinson, City Attorney, for Defendant and Respondent.

No appearance for Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.

LILLIE, J.

By resort to administrative mandamus (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5) appellant as a taxpayer sought to compel respondent City of Santa Barbara to grant a hearing of an application for a zoning variance by the real parties in interest. Such application, it appears, was voluntarily withdrawn when the application was before respondents' planning commission. On appeal by petitioner to the city council, that body upheld the action of the planning commission...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases