MORRIS v. HOERSTER

Nos. A-9664, A-9665.

370 S.W.2d 451 (1963)

Chester R. MORRIS, Petitioner, v. Sam A. HOERSTER and John T. Middleton, Respondents. Chester R. MORRIS, Petitioner, v. Joseph R. SMILEY et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Rehearing Denied October 2, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Chester R. Morris, petitioner pro se.

Waggoner Carr, Atty. Gen., Austin, Pat Bailey, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondents.


PER CURIAM.

We agree with the result reached by the Court of Civil Appeals. 368 S.W.2d 639. However, we do not agree with the Court of Civil Appeals that petitioner's recourse in denial of a bill of discovery brought in conjunction with pending litigation, though brought as an independent action, is only by way of mandamus in the Supreme Court. The reasoning in Crane v. Tunks, 160 Tex. 182, 328 S.W.2d 434

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases