1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 218 Cal.App.2d
  5. 218 Cal.App.2d 601 (1963)
 

BELLE VISTA INVESTMENT CO. v. HASSEN

Docket No. 26953.

218 Cal.App.2d 601 (1963)

32 Cal. Rptr. 399

BELLE VISTA INVESTMENT COMPANY, Cross-complainant and Respondent, v. ERWIN E. HASSEN, Cross-defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

July 24, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Irmas & Rutter for Cross-defendant and Appellant.

Joseph W. Fairfield and Ethelyn F. Black for Cross-complainant and Respondent.

THE COURT.

[1] After a judgment for money had been entered against appellant, an undertaking executed by two sureties was given for the purpose of staying execution of the judgment under Code of Civil Procedure, section 942. The sureties failed to qualify. This appellate court has discretion to issue a writ of supersedeas on condition that a proper undertaking be furnished. (Isaak v. Evidon, 197 Cal.App.2d 453

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases