ROTH v. ROTH

No. 3601.

156 So.2d 663 (1963)

Kathleen W. ROTH, Appellant, v. Howard H. ROTH, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

October 9, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph S. Rodriquez, St. Petersburg, for appellant.

Jack Clark, of Harris, Wing, Clark & Green, St. Petersburg, for appellee.


PER CURIAM.

The appellant, in the conclusion of her brief, states:

"In view of the misconception of law by the lower Court, this cause should be remanded with instructions to find the defendant in contempt, to take testimony as to attorney's fees, to award petitioner's attorney a reasonable fee and to modify the Property Settlement Agreement."

We find no error in the order of the trial judge refusing to find appellee in contempt so we affirm and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases