COHEN v. GREAT A. & P. TEA CO.


39 Misc.2d 769 (1963)

Bride Cohen, Respondent, v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc., Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

May 23, 1963


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Weisman, Celler, Allan, Spett & Sheinberg (Emanuel Haber and Lester Samuels of counsel), for appellant.

Spero & Charnin (David R. Weisman of counsel), for respondent.

Concur — BROWN and BENJAMIN, JJ.; HART, J., concurs in memorandum.


Appeal from order dated March 4, 1963 affirmed, with $10 costs and taxable disbursements. No opinion.

Appeal from order dated February 15, 1963 dismissed, without costs, as academic. The latter order was superseded by the order granting reargument.

HART, J. (concurs with the following memorandum).

While I agree with the affirmance of the order granting this 75-year-old plaintiff, who is suffering...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases