FREEDMAN v. CHOLICK ET UX


233 Or. 569 (1963)

379 P.2d 575

FREEDMAN v. CHOLICK ET UX

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed March 13, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul R. Meyer, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Kobin & Meyer, Portland.

Thomas J. Moore, Portland, argued the cause for respondents and cross-appellants. With him on the briefs were Schedler & Moore, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, SLOAN, GOODWIN and LUSK, Justices.


AFFIRMED.

GOODWIN, J.

This is an action for damages for breach of contract.

Plaintiff paid defendant $250 for an option to buy a corner lot in downtown Portland for $115,000. Plaintiff in due course elected to exercise the option. Defendant was unable to deliver possession. This action followed. Plaintiff demanded in damages the difference between $115,000 and $132,000, the alleged market value of the property at the time he exercised the option. He...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases