SPROUL v. STATE TAX COMM.


234 Or. 567 (1963)

382 P.2d 99

SPROUL ET UX v. STATE TAX COMMISSION

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Reversed May 29, 1963.

Petition for rehearing denied June 25, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald H. Burnett, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General, and Carlisle B. Roberts, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.

James R. Moore, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. On the brief were Mautz, Souther, Spaulding, Kinsey and Williamson, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL and GOODWIN, Justices.


REVERSED.

O'CONNELL, J.

Plaintiff brings this suit to set aside a deficiency assessment resulting from defendant's rejection of a claimed deduction for expenses incurred in defending a murder charge. Defendant appeals from a decree of the Oregon Tax Court allowing the deduction as an "ordinary and necessary" expense incurred by plaintiffs in carrying on their business. The applicable statute is ORS 316.305 (1), which reads as follows:

"In computing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases