1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 130 S.E.2d
  5. 130 S.E.2d 663 (1963)
 

STATE UTILITIES COMMISSION v. RYDER TANK LINE, INC.

No. 474.

130 S.E.2d 663 (1963)

259 N.C. 363

STATE of North Carolina ex rel. UTILITIES COMMISSION v. RYDER TANK LINE, INC., and Central Transport, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 1, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cannon, Wolfe & Coggin, by J. Archie Cannon, Greensboro, for Ryder Tank Line, Inc., appellant.

Martin & Whitley, by Robt. M. Martin, High Point, for Central Transport, Inc., protestant, appellant.

Bailey, Dixon & Wooten, by J. Ruffin Bailey, Raleigh, Hogue & Hill, by C. D. Hogue, Jr., Wilmington, for Bulk Haulers, Inc., appellee.

HIGGINS, Justice.

The technical objections to the form of Bulk Haulers' application and the Commission's order allowing it in part, are inconsequential. They are not sustained. We need, therefore, discuss only the questions whether the applicant has carried the burden of showing (1) a public need for the limited service, and (2) the ability to perform that service. The Commission's resolution of these questions is binding on the Court if supported by competent, material...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases