1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 221 Cal.App.2d
  5. 221 Cal.App.2d 566 (1963)
 

JACKSON v. ARC INVESTMENT CO.

Docket No. 26461.

221 Cal.App.2d 566 (1963)

34 Cal. Rptr. 570

MORRIS JACKSON, JR., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. ARC INVESTMENT COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

October 28, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rosenfeld & Tucker and Manfred Rosenfeld for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

No appearance for Defendant and Respondent.

WOOD, P.J.

In this action plaintiffs sought a declaration that an automobile conditional sale contract, and a promissory note given in connection therewith, were void under the provisions of section 2982, subdivisions (a) and (c), of the Civil Code in that the plaintiffs did not make a cash down payment as stated in the contract; the "Time Price Differential" was not entered on the contract; and the contract balance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases