WILSON
v.
SAGINAW CIRCUIT JUDGE.
CHAFFEE
v.
STENGER.
Supreme Court of Michigan.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided June 6, 1963.
Decided June 6, 1963.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Roger J. Oeming, for plaintiff Wilson.
Peter F. Cicinelli and Eugene D. Mossner for defendant Saginaw Circuit Judge.
Amicus Curiae: Fred Roland Allaben, in mandamus action, asking clarification of rules pertaining to discovery.
van Benschoten & van Benschoten, for plaintiff Chaffee.
Stanton, Taylor, McGraw & Collison (Ralph B. Taylor, of counsel), for defendant Stenger.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
SOURIS, J.
These cases1 require our determination whether statements and reports of witnesses and parties procured by an insured party's insurance carrier were subject to discovery under the provisions of our former Court Rule No 35, § 6 (a) (1945).2 Since January 1, 1963, discovery such as was sought and ordered in these cases has been subject to the provisions of our new court rules, specifically GCR...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
