1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 130 S.E.2d
  5. 130 S.E.2d 640 (1963)
 

STATE v. SOSSAMON

No. 509.

130 S.E.2d 640 (1963)

259 N.C. 378

STATE v. D. H. SOSSAMON, Jr.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 1, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

T. O. Stennett and Harry E. Faggart, Jr., Charlotte, for defendant appellant.

T. W. Bruton, Atty. Gen., and Charles D. Barham, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

PER CURIAM.

For reasons stated in State v. Sossamon, N.C., 130 S.E.2d 638, the warrant on which the judgment of March 31, 1960, is based is fatally defective and therefore insufficient to confer jurisdiction in that it does not allege an essential element of the offense defined in G.S. § 20-28(a). See State v. Jernigan, 255 N.C. 732, 122 S.E.2d 711. Hence,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases