1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 61 Wn.2d
  5. 61 Wn.2d 708 (1963)
 

STATE NAT. GUARD v. STATE PERS. BD.

No. 36581.

61 Wn.2d 708 (1963)

379 P.2d 1002

WASHINGTON STATE NATIONAL GUARD (MILITARY DEPARTMENT), Respondent, v. WASHINGTON STATE PERSONNEL BOARD et al., Appellants, CECIL A. BECHDOLDT et al., Intervenors.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

March 28, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The Attorney General, R. Ted Bottiger and Charles I. McClure, Assistants, for appellants.

The Attorney General and Earl E. Yates, Assistant, for respondent.

William S. Howard, for intervenors.

HILL, J.

Quaere: Does the Washington State Personnel Board, under the powers and authority given it by the Washington State Civil Service Law,1 have any right of review or any control over the dismissal of Air Defense Technicians (National Guard) by reason of their status as civilian employees?

Answer: No.

[1] Reason: The federal statutes2 and regulations

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases