STATE v. STULTZ


235 Or. 534 (1963)

385 P.2d 763

STATE OF OREGON v. STULTZ

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed October 17, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leo Levenson, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Morris Zipper, Portland.

Lewis B. Hampton, Deputy District Attorney, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him of the brief was George Van Hoomissen, District Attorney, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN and DENECKE, Justices.


AFFIRMED.

GOODWIN, J.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of sodomy and appeals.

The only assignment of error challenges the conviction on the ground that the defendant was denied a constitutional right when the trial court refused to order the state to bring the complaining witness into the courtroom during the examination of prospective jurors.

When the case was called for trial, both the state and the defendant had announced "ready." The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases