1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 222 Cal.App.2d
  5. 222 Cal.App.2d 547 (1963)
 

KNIPE v. BARKDULL

Docket No. 20920.

222 Cal.App.2d 547 (1963)

35 Cal. Rptr. 283

ANDY KNIPE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. BERNICE BARKDULL, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

November 22, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leonard M. Conry, District Attorney, Hill & Dalton and Charles V. Moore for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Mahan, Harland & Gromala and John A. Gromala for Defendant and Respondent.

SALSMAN, J.

We reverse the judgment here as to appellant Nellie Knipe because it rests upon a finding of fact which has no support in the evidence or the record. We reverse the judgment as to both appellants because they were precluded from introducing any evidence on a pleaded cause of action upon which they relied for recovery.

Appellants and respondent entered into a written contract dated March 1, 1958....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases