1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 233 Or.
  5. 233 Or. 505 (1963)
 

DORR ET UX v. JANSSEN ET AL

233 Or. 505 (1963)

378 P.2d 999

DORR ET UX v. JANSSEN ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed March 6, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles D. Burt, Salem, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellants.

Sam Speerstra, Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were William B. Wyllie and Rhoten, Rhoten & Speerstra, Salem.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, SLOAN, GOODWIN and LUSK, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

GOODWIN, J.

This is an action for damages for alleged fraud in the sale of a cattle ranch. The plaintiff-purchasers appeal from a directed verdict for the defendant-vendor.

The transaction out of which this litigation arose began with an exchange of property. The purchasers, hereinafter referred to as Dorr, exchanged certain equities which they owned in Oregon real property for an equity in the vendor's ranch in California. The vendor, hereinafter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases