RAHJA v. CURRENT

No. 38,603.

264 Minn. 465 (1963)

119 N.W. (2d) 699

MAE RAHJA v. MILO CURRENT.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

February 1, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wangensteen & Bangs, for appellant.

Spellacy, Spellacy, Lano & Anderson, for respondent.


ROGOSHESKE, JUSTICE.

This is a personal injury action which arose as a result of an automobile's striking a highway washout during the nighttime. The jury returned a verdict for defendant-driver. Plaintiff, a passenger and the owner of the automobile, appeals from a denial of her posttrial motions.

The essential problem is presented by plaintiff's claim that a new trial should have been granted because of errors in the instructions to the jury.

Defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases