HUGHES, Justice.
In appellees' Motion for Rehearing it is stated that "The Appellant and the Court have evidently overlooked the fact that the reason the Appellees are withholding certain moneys in the instant case is actually because of contractual provisions rather than the provisions found in Article 6674m."
The contract between McLaughlin and the Highway Department is not in the record. Appellees, in their answer, pleaded:
"That the State Highway...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
