MOOSBRUGGER v. McGRAW-EDISON COMPANY

Civ. No. 3-62-261.

215 F.Supp. 486 (1963)

Charles O. MOOSBRUGGER, Plaintiff, v. McGRAW-EDISON COMPANY, American Laundry Machinery Industries, Small Equipment Sales Company, Equipment Acceptance Corporation and Econ-O-Wash, Inc., all foreign corporations, Defendants.

United States District Court D. Minnesota, Third Division.

February 14, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stringer, Donnelly & Sharood, by Henry H. Cowie, Jr., St. Paul, Minn., for plaintiff.

Young, Denenberg & Mullery, by Malcolm D. Young, Omaha, Neb., and Dorsey, Owen, Marquart, Windhorst & West, by William A. Whitlock, Minneapolis, Minn., for defendants McGraw-Edison Co. and Equipment Acceptance Corp.

King, MacGregor & Lommen, Minneapolis, Minn., for defendant Econ-O-Wash, Inc.


DONOVAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff commenced this action against defendants in Ramsey County District Court to recover damages on a contract of warranty, express and implied, and upon which plaintiff relied.1

The contract of sale involved certain coin-operated dry cleaning machines. These machines were designed and manufactured by the McGraw-Edison Company (herein referred to as McGraw) or its subsidiaries, and sold to the plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases