LOCAL 28, INTERNAT'L ORGANIZATION OF MASTERS, M. & P. v. N. L. R. B.

Nos. 17062, 17157, 17193.

321 F.2d 376 (1963)

LOCAL 28, INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF MASTERS, MATES AND PILOTS, INC., AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. ASSOCIATED MARITIME WORKERS, LOCAL NO. 3, INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF MASTERS, MATES AND PILOTS, INC., AFL-CIO, Respondent. INGRAM BARGE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided June 20, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Stephen B. Lemann, New Orleans, La., of the bar of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. W. Graham Claytor, Jr., and Brice M. Clagett, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for petitioner in No. 17,193.

Miss Margaret M. Farmer, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, and Messrs. Stuart Rothman, General Counsel at the time the brief was filed, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Melvin Pollack, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, were on the brief, for respondent in Nos. 17,062, and 17,193 and petitioner in No. 17,157.

No brief was filed and no appearance was entered for petitioner in No. 17,062.

No brief was filed and no appearance was entered for respondent in No. 17,157.

Before FAHY, WASHINGTON and BURGER, Circuit Judges.


WASHINGTON, Circuit Judge.

In No. 17,193, we have before us a petition by Ingram Barge Company to review and modify certain portions of an order of the National Labor Relations Board denying relief against Local 28, International Organization of Masters, Mates, and Pilots, Inc., AFL-CIO. Ingram had charged Local 28 with unfair labor practices. The Board found Local 28 guilty of a violation of Section 8(b) (1) (A) of the National...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases