WILSEY, BENNETT COMPANY, a corporation, Petitioner,
v.
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION and United States of America, Respondents.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 14, 1963.
March 14, 1963.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Graham, James & Rolph, Alexander D. Calhoun, Jr., LaForest E. Phillips, Jr., and G. Merle Bergman, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.
Lee Loevinger, Asst. Atty. Gen., Anti-Trust Div., Irwin A. Seibel and Gerald Kadish, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., James L. Pimper, Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Mitchell, Deputy Gen. Counsel, and Paul D. Page, Jr., Atty., Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, D. C., for respondents.
Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, George D. Rives and Robert N. Lowry, San Francisco, Cal., for intervenor Matson Nav. Co. in support of respondents.
Before POPE, BROWNING and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
PER CURIAM.
We conclude that the order of the Federal Maritime Commission had "`warrant in the record' and a reasonable basis in law." N. L. R. B. v. Hearst Publications, 322 U.S. 111, 131, 64 S.Ct. 851, 88 L.Ed. 1170 (1944). We do not consider it appropriate in the circumstances of this case to consider the questions presented for the first time in the petition for review filed in this Court. United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
