1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 212 F.Supp.
  5. 212 F.Supp. 475 (1963)
 

DALY v. TOOMEY

Civ. A. No. 1876-59.

212 F.Supp. 475 (1963)

Virginia Warren DALY, Plaintiff, v. James C. TOOMEY and John J. Toomey, Trustees, Sinclair Refining Company, and William T. Muldrow, Defendants,

United States District Court District of Columbia, Civil Division.

January 10, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John L. Laskey, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Harry L. Ryan, Jr., Washington, D. C., for defendants Toomey.

John P. Arness, Washington, D. C., for defendant Sinclair Refining Co.

H. Mason Welch, Washington, D. C., for defendant William T. Muldrow.

PINE, District Judge.

Defendants, hereinafter referred to as the Toomeys, Sinclair and Muldrow, have filed a joint motion to enter judgments in their favor under Rule 50(b) Fed.R. Civ.P., or in the alternative for a new trial.

Their Memorandum of Points and Authorities attached thereto does not discuss two contentions vigorously asserted at the trial. However, their motion does state that the Court erred "in refusing to grant the motions of defendants for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases