1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 233 Or.
  5. 233 Or. 452 (1963)
 

RAZ v. MILLS

233 Or. 452 (1963)

378 P.2d 959

RAZ v. MILLS

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed February 20, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Warren Hastings, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were James K. Buell and Phillips, Coughlin, Buell & Phillips, Portland.

Francis E. Marsh, McMinnville, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Marsh, Marsh, Dashney & Cushing, McMinnville.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN and LUSK, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM.

This is an action for damages arising out of a collision between two automobiles. The verdict was for the defendant. The plaintiff appeals.

The facts of the accident are reported in Raz v. Mills, 231 Or. 220, 372 P.2d 955 (1962). In the first case, Mrs. Raz recovered a judgment against Mrs. Mills. We affirmed, holding that there was a jury question whether...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases