1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 21 Wis.2d
  5. 21 Wis.2d 661 (1963)
 

AXEL v. STATE BAR

21 Wis.2d 661 (1963)

AXEL, Plaintiff, v. STATE BAR OF WISCONSIN, Defendant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 27, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff there was a brief and oral argument by Gordon K. Aaron of Milwaukee.

For the defendant there was a brief and oral argument by W. Wade Boardman of Madison.

PER CURIAM.

The jurisdiction of this court under its general supervisory powers over the integrated State Bar of Wisconsin to grant leave to commence the original action is not questioned. That question was settled in In re Integration of the Bar (1958), 5 Wis.2d 618, 93 N.W.2d 601, and the principle applied in Lathrop v. Donohue (1960), 10 Wis.2d 230, 102 N.W.2d 404. The issue...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases