1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 221 Cal.App.2d
  5. 221 Cal.App.2d 460 (1963)
 

EHMAN v. MOORE

Docket No. 20703.

221 Cal.App.2d 460 (1963)

34 Cal. Rptr. 540

JOHN B. EHMAN, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LOUIS MOORE et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

October 23, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Louis C. Moore, in pro. per., Hudson, Martin, Ferrante & Street and Peter J. Coniglio for Defendants and Appellants.

Hoge, Fenton, Jones & Appel and Charles H. Page for Plaintiff and Respondent.

SHOEMAKER, J.

Defendants Louis C. and Eduarda S. Moore appeal from a money judgment for plaintiff John B. Ehman in an action to recover on a promissory note.

[1a] Appellants' sole contention is that the trial court erred in terminating the trial and ordering judgment for respondent before appellants had had an opportunity to complete their defense. Under this general assignment of error, appellants specify that the trial court improperly ruled...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases