1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.2d
  4. 59 Cal.2d
  5. 59 Cal.2d 610 (1963)
 

MEADOW v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. L.A. 27128.

59 Cal.2d 610 (1963)

381 P.2d 648

30 Cal. Rptr. 824

SHARON KATHRYN MEADOW et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; BEILENSON, MEYER, ROSENFELD & SUSMAN, Real Party in Interest.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

May 21, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

N.E. Youngblood, Schwartz & Sandler and Merle Sandler for Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

Beilenson, Meyer, Rosenfeld & Susman and Peter R. Cohen for Real Party in Interest.

SCHAUER, J.

Petitioners husband and wife seek through mandamus and prohibition to compel respondent Los Angeles Superior Court to grant petitioner wife's motion for substitution of attorneys in a divorce suit brought by her against petitioner husband and to thereafter dismiss such suit, and also to restrain that court from any further action in connection with the divorce other than as above stated. The law firm of Beilenson, Meyer, Rosenfeld & Susman (hereinafter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases