LEBOW, ETC. v. REICHEL

[No. 288, September Term, 1962.]

231 Md. 421 (1963)

190 A.2d 642

LEBOW AND COOPER MOTOR LINES, INC. v. REICHEL

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided May 10, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul F. Due, with whom were Douglas R. Due and Due, Nickerson, Whiteford & Taylor on the brief, for appellants.

Max R. Israelson and Melvin J. Sykes for appellee.

The cause was argued before HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT, HORNEY and MARBURY, JJ.


PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from a substantial judgment entered after a jury's verdict, assessing damages for personal injuries suffered as the result of an automobile collision.

The appellant seeks to raise three questions: (1) Should the trial court have instructed the jury that the per diem argument is not evidence?; (2) Was the appellee entitled to receive only the present value of his pain and suffering...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases