Respondent Ferris contends preliminarily that the appeal is untimely and unauthorized because it is taken from a decision which, on appellant's application for reopening and reconsideration of the board's prior decision, granted the application and "upon such reopening and reconsideration" adhered to the prior decision. Respondent mistakenly relies on Matter of Crowley (Corsi) (275 App. Div. 977), as there we did not dismiss the appeal as untimely or unauthorized but...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.