1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 19 Wis.2d
  5. 19 Wis.2d 614 (1963)
 

RONDESVEDT v. RUNNING

19 Wis.2d 614 (1963)

RONDESVEDT, Appellant, v. RUNNING, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 12, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Robert Zum Brunnen of Spooner.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Warren Winton of Shell Lake.

FAIRCHILD, J.

The point has grown imperceptibly, extending into the water from deposits which were made on and against lots 8 and 9. It does not abut any dry land owned by defendant. Plaintiff, as owner of lots 8 and 9, claims the entire point (hereinafter referred to as "alluvion") as having been added, by accretion, to his lots.1

Defendant does not challenge the general rule relied on, but advances two theories under which it...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases