REK INVESTMENT CO. v. CITY OF NEWARK


80 N.J. Super. 552 (1963)

194 A.2d 368

REK INVESTMENT COMPANY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. THE CITY OF NEWARK, RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 17, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Jack Okin argued the cause for petitioner-appellant (Messrs. Okin and Okin, attorneys).

Mr. Saul A. Wolfe argued the cause for respondent City of Newark (Mr. Norman N. Schiff, Corporation Counsel of the City of Newark, attorney).

Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, for respondent Division of Tax Appeals, filed a statement in lieu of brief pursuant to R.R. 1:7-4(b), (Mr. Alan B. Handler, of counsel).

Before Judges GAULKIN, LEWIS and LABRECQUE.


The opinion of the court was delivered by LABRECQUE, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

Rek Investment Company appeals from a judgment of the Division of Tax Appeals fixing the assessment on its real property at 756-62 Broad Street, Newark, for the year 1961.

For the year in question Rek had appealed to the Essex County Board of Taxation from an assessment of land, $268,900; improvements, $45,700; total: $314,600...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases