PANTER v. SOBESKY

Calendar No. 30, Docket No. 50,125.

370 Mich. 257 (1963)

121 N.W.2d 415

PANTER v. SOBESKY.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided May 9, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph A. Gillis and Davidow & Davidow (Larry S. Davidow, of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Harty, Austin & Jones (Paul W. Harty, of counsel), for defendants.


PER CURIAM:

The question here presented is one of procedure and not one of determination of merit.

Plaintiff Harold Panter was employed by defendant Office Products, Inc., between May 8, 1955, and March 12, 1962. The employment was under an express contract in the nature of a letter of undertaking and acceptance. Its relevant provision here is the undertaking by the employee to assign to the employer without additional compensation "all ideas, discoveries...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases