1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 217 F.Supp.
  5. 217 F.Supp. 404 (1963)
 

BEY v. MULDOON

Civ. A. No. 30789.

217 F.Supp. 404 (1963)

Abdullah Ahmad BEY et al. v. Francis H. MULDOON et al.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

May 9, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dorfman, Pechner, Sacks & Dorfman by Bernard Sacks, for Benjamin Hicks, Harry Pintozzi and others, plaintiffs.

Kelly, Deasey & Scanlan, William R. Deasey, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendants, Francis H. Muldoon, Alfred Corry, Stuart J. Sobelman, Trustees, Robert G. Kelly, Philadelphia Marine Trade Assn.

Wolf, Block, Schorr & Solis-Cohen, Michael L. Temin, Philadelphia, Pa., Attorneys for defendant, Broad Street Trust Co.

Freedman, Landy & Lorry, Abraham E. Freedman, Marvin I. Barish, Philadelphia, Pa., Attorneys for defendants International Longshoremen's Assn., Local Union No. 1291, Richard L. Askew and Abraham E. Freedman.

JOSEPH S. LORD, III, District Judge.

This action involves a claim by certain longshoremen to a fund created pursuant to the collective bargaining contract between their union, I.L.A. Local 1291, and an employer association, Philadelphia Marine Trade Association (P. M.T.A.). Plaintiffs, sugarworkers, claim that although the intention of the collective bargaining agreement was that the fund was to be used to compensate them for lost employment opportunities due to technological...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases