1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 222 F.Supp.
  5. 222 F.Supp. 396 (1963)
 

CHANDON CHAMPAGNE CORP. v. SAN MARINO WINE CORP.

Civ. A. No. 60-C-20.

222 F.Supp. 396 (1963)

CHANDON CHAMPAGNE CORPORATION, Societe Anonyme Maison Moet & Chandon, and Schieffelin & Co., Plaintiffs, v. SAN MARINO WINE CORPORATION, doing business as Pierre Perignon Champagne Co., Defendant.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

May 28, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Blum, Moscovitz, Friedman & Blum, New York City, for plaintiffs, Alex Friedman, Martin J. Beran, New York City, of counsel.

Joseph J. Shapiro, New York City, for defendant, Burton L. Lilling, New York City, of counsel.

BRUCHHAUSEN, District Judge.

The plaintiffs seek injunctive relief for trademark infringement. The claims for unfair competition, accounting and damages have been waived.

The evidence established that the plaintiffs are producers, distillers, bottlers and distributors of imported champagne known as Dom Perignon. This trademark was registered in the United States Patent Office on September 4, 1956 under No. 634...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases