1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 18 Wis.2d
  5. 18 Wis.2d 599 (1963)
 

MILWAUKEE v. PISCUINE

18 Wis.2d 599 (1963)

CITY OF MILWAUKEE, Respondent, v. PISCUINE, Appellant. SAME, Respondent, v. ARTIS, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 5, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there were briefs by Walter J. Steininger, attorney, and Thomas P. Maroney and Clarence P. Nett of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Steininger and Mr. Maroney.

For the respondent there was a brief by John J. Fleming, city attorney, and Maurice L. Markey, assistant city attorney, and oral argument by Mr. Markey.

WILKIE, J.

The whole contest on this appeal is on the validity of city of Milwaukee ordinance 90-25. The appellants do not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the convictions. They make three assertions:

1. The city of Milwaukee does not have the power to enact this ordinance.

2. The ordinance is unconstitutional because it violates the equal rights of women.

3. The ordinance is arbitrary and unreasonable and hence an invalid...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases